Climate Change in the Nordic and Baltic Regions: Landscape, Wildlife, and Future Challenges

He notes how new landforms (like a volcano named Eldfell – literally “fire mountain”) needed new names, and how once-deafening seabird cliffs have grown eerily quiet in recent years. Magnason wonders if he may live to see the day when “fuglabjarg,” Icelandic for “bird cliff,” “becomes a metaphor for silence,” as the birds vanish from these crags. This poetic observation from Iceland reflects a wider reality: across the Nordic countries and the Baltic Sea region, climate change is rewriting the map – physically and even linguistically – at a pace that often outstrips our ability to adjust. The following sections explore some of the major climate challenges in these regions, from melting glaciers and rising seas to shifting ecosystems and extreme weather events, supported by scientific findings and recent observations.

Warming and Melting in the High North

Nowhere is the warming more apparent than in the high northern latitudes. The Nordic region, which includes Iceland and Scandinavia, is heating faster than the global average. In fact, Iceland is one of the fastest-warming places on Earth – warming as much as four times faster than the Northern Hemisphere’s average. As a result, glaciers that have crowned its mountains for millennia are rapidly shrinking. In the past 20 years, Icelandic glaciers have retreated more than they did in the previous 100 years. Some glacier tongues are pulling back at stunning rates of around 100 meters per year. This mirrors trends across the Nordic Arctic: in Sweden, scientists warn that “if emissions continue at current levels, four out of five Swedish glaciers may disappear by 2100”. A striking example is Sweden’s highest peak – once a glacier-capped summit of Kebnekaise – which lost its ice cap to melting, causing it to lose its title as the nation’s tallest mountain in 2019. Likewise in Norway, glaciers like Langfjordjøkelen in the far north are melting at alarming speeds, retreating over 300 meters in just a decade (2012–2022).

One direct consequence of vanishing ice is rising sea levels. While the giant ice sheets of Greenland and Antarctica hold the greatest potential for sea-level rise, the myriad small glaciers in the Nordic region contribute significantly to current sea-level trends. Iceland’s ice alone, if completely melted, would raise global sea levels by about 1 cm – seemingly small, but roughly 1% of the projected 1 m global sea-level rise expected this century. Along Norway’s long coastline, projections suggest the sea level could rise by up to one meter over the next 100 years, threatening low-lying communities and infrastructure. This encroaching ocean is already forcing Nordic planners to rethink coastal defenses, even as in some areas land uplift (a relic of Ice Age glaciers) offers a temporary buffering effect. The Nordic and Baltic region overall has warmed about 0.08 °C per decade over the last century, faster than the global average (~0.05 °C/decade), illustrating the pronounced regional impact of global warming. Warmer winters mean less snow and ice cover in places that once stayed frozen, and the very definition of what is “normal” weather is shifting.

“Green” Deserts and New Lakes: Changing Landscapes

As the ice retreats, the land itself is reborn in unexpected ways. Vast expanses that were once ice or barren permafrost are greening. In Iceland, areas of black volcanic sand are sprouting with moss and birch seedlings as the climate warms. One remarkable case is Skeiðarársandur – whose Icelandic name means “boat-river-sand” – a sprawling glacial outwash plain that for centuries was regularly flooded by meltwater. Today, with the glacier feeding it in full retreat, the Skeiðarársandur plain is drying out and being slowly colonized by birch forest. Magnason describes how Iceland’s longest bridge, built in 1974 to span Skeiðarársandur’s wild glacial rivers, now stands over dry sand and scrubby vegetation – “over black sand that is slowly becoming a birch forest,” as he puts it. What do we call a “boat-river-sand” when the boats and river are gone and trees take root? Such questions are no longer academic. Across the north, new lakes are forming at the snouts of retreating glaciers, and new valleys are emerging where ice sheets have vanished. In Finland and Sweden, the treeline is creeping northward and uphill; tundra is giving way to shrub and forest. Even the soils are changing: where permafrost thaws, the ground can soften or collapse (leading to phenomena like thermokarst pits and subsiding roads). The Nordic landscape, long shaped by ice, is now rapidly reshaped by its absence.

This landscape upheaval isn’t without risks. For instance, the loss of ice cover on steep mountains can destabilize rocks and increase landslides or volcanic activity (as less weight holds down the volatile geology). And while a “greening” Arctic might sound positive, the encroachment of vegetation on former ice and tundra can disrupt existing ecosystems and release stored carbon from soils. Scientists sometimes liken Iceland to a “canary in a coal mine” for these changes – a preview of transformations that may await other parts of the world as warming continues. The speed of change in the Nordic region serves as a wake-up call: places we think of as permanent features – glaciers, snow-capped peaks, frozen plains – can alter drastically within a single human lifetime. Indeed, maps are having to be redrawn; hikers in Iceland’s highlands found that glacier positions marked on decade-old maps are now off by over a kilometer due to recent retreat. Such rapid change challenges not only our maps but our vocabulary and sense of place.

Silence on the Cliffs: Wildlife in Distress

Perhaps the most heartbreaking sign of change is the silence creeping into once-thriving wild places. The North Atlantic and Arctic waters around Scandinavia and Iceland have long been home to millions of seabirds – puffins, guillemots, kittiwakes, and terns that nest in cacophonous colonies on coastal cliffs. Now many of those cliffs have emptied. Seabird populations are plummeting across the region, driven by a combination of warming oceans, shifting prey, and other human pressures. In Iceland, puffin colonies have decreased by around 70% in recent decades, and the Atlantic puffin is now considered vulnerable. Andri Magnason speaks of how seabirds struggling to survive makes him far sadder than melting glaciers do, emotionally – the prospect of an Iceland with silent shores is deeply concerning. That concern is echoed throughout Nordic countries. In Norway, for example, researchers using before-and-after photographs on seabird cliffs found an almost 90% collapse in the number of black-legged kittiwakes (a key cliff-nesting gull) on the mainland coast since the 1980s. One famous Norwegian colony at Syltefjord once teemed with a quarter-million kittiwakes; today only a few thousand remain, a “very weak shadow” of its former self. Overall, Norway’s seabird counts fell by nearly one-third in just the decade from 2005 to 2015. Similar declines are noted in parts of Sweden and in the Baltic Sea region, as food chains are disrupted.

What’s driving this silent collapse? Climate change is a major culprit. Warming oceans around the Nordic and Baltic seas alter the populations of fish that seabirds rely on. For instance, in warmer waters the lipid-rich cold-water fish (like capelin or herring) might become scarcer or shift their range, leaving birds without adequate food during breeding seasons. “It’s a strong signal that something is not right in the ocean,” says one Norwegian ecologist of the seabird crash. Indeed, seabirds are sentinel species for marine health – their decline often indicates that the North Atlantic marine ecosystem is under stress. Aside from warming, other factors like overfishing, pollution, and even avian diseases (such as the recent avian flu outbreaks) compound the losses. But the thread linking many of these factors is climate: warmer seas and changing currents make it harder for birds to find food, and extreme weather can directly destroy nests or starving birds may abandon their breeding sites. The metaphor Magnason invoked – a “bird cliff” turning from the loudest place to the quietest – is becoming reality. The age of extinction is not a distant prospect but an unfolding process on Nordic coasts.

It’s not only birds. Land animals and indigenous ways of life are also feeling the strain. In Arctic Scandinavia, the Sámi people have herded reindeer for centuries, but now warmer winters often bring rain that freezes into ice, sealing off the lichen pastures that reindeer dig for under snow. This leads to starvation events for the herds. Shifting climate zones also threaten iconic cold-loving species like the Arctic fox and ptarmigan in northern Fennoscandia. Forest ecosystems, too, are in flux – southern insect pests survive milder winters and move north, sometimes devastating boreal forests. The web of life, finely tuned to cold climates and distinct seasons, is being tested by the rapid warming.

Extreme Heat and Wildfire in a Once-Cool North

The Nordic and Baltic countries have historically been synonymous with cold winters and mild summers. It’s a region where people cherish the brief summer nights that never get truly dark, and where wildfires or heatwaves were once rare. That is changing fast. In recent years, record-breaking heat waves have struck above the Arctic Circle and across northern Europe, bringing temperatures few residents ever expected to feel. The summer of 2018 was a major wake-up call: an intense, persistent heatwave turned large parts of Scandinavia into a tinderbox. Sweden endured its hottest May–July on record in 150 years, coupled with severe drought. The consequences were unprecedented – by July 2018, wildfires had burned over 10,000 hectares in Sweden, which is 24 times more area than the annual average in the previous decade. Dozens of these fires raged north of the Arctic Circle, forcing evacuations and drawing international firefighting assistance. Neighboring Finland and Norway also saw the mercury soar. In northern Finland, temperatures hit 33 °C (91 °F) in July 2018, and even in Arctic Norway’s Troms county it reached 33 °C – with numerous local heat records set across 14 Norwegian locations. These figures are astonishing for regions so far north, highlighting how even the Arctic is no longer immune to heat extremes.

The impacts of such extreme heat go beyond immediate fire danger. In 2018, crops withered in the fields in Sweden and the Baltic states due to drought, prompting animal feed shortages. Peat bogs dried out and burned. Rivers ran low, affecting hydroelectric power and fish. Heat stress even became a public health concern in a region where few homes have air conditioning. Climate scientists warn that these formerly once-in-a-century events could become regular occurrences if warming continues. European authorities noted that wildfires are now flaring in areas “outside the traditional fire zone” – places like Sweden, which typically have wet, cool summers, are experiencing Mediterranean-style fire seasons. Lightning, which increases in hotter weather, has ignited blazes in parched northern forests. And this is not just a single bad year: the trend is towards longer fire seasons and more frequent heatwaves in northern Europe. Scandinavia’s future summers may regularly see 30 °C+ days and heightened wildfire risk, conditions that challenge infrastructure and ecosystems adapted to cooler climes.

Heavy rainfall events have also become more intense in some areas, as a warmer atmosphere holds more moisture. Paradoxically, the region faces both heightened flood risks and deeper summer droughts, depending on the season. Climate models project that winters will get wetter (25–75% more precipitation in northern areas by late century) while summers, especially in southern parts of the Baltic region, get considerably drier (potentially 20–45% less rainfall). This seasonal shift could mean more winter floods and heavy snowfall in parts of Norway and Sweden, but harsher droughts in places like southern Sweden, Denmark, or the Baltic states in summer. The challenge for Nordic and Baltic societies is to adapt to this increased variability – to weather proof cities against downpours and also manage water resources in drought.

The Baltic Sea: Warming Waters and New Species

The Baltic Sea, a nearly landlocked brackish sea at the heart of northern Europe, is uniquely sensitive to climate change. It’s already showing clear signs of a changing climate. Water temperatures in the Baltic Sea are rising, and seasonal sea ice in the northern Baltic (Gulf of Bothnia) is shrinking with shorter ice seasons. According to regional assessments, the Baltic Sea’s surface waters could warm by another 2–3 °C on average by the end of this century, under high emissions scenarios. This means summer heatwaves won’t only be on land – the sea itself will experience prolonged warm periods. By 2100, Baltic summers may feature “tropical nights” (nighttime temps >20 °C) lasting weeks on end and sea-surface temperatures above 18 °C persisting a month longer than today. For beachgoers that might sound pleasant, but the ecological ripple effects are concerning. Warmer, stagnant waters favor harmful blue-green algal blooms, which the Baltic is already notorious for. In recent decades, massive algae outbreaks have turned the sea an iridescent green in summer, damaging tourism and marine life. Scientists project that without strong action to reduce nutrient pollution (runoff of nitrogen and phosphorus that feeds algae), climate change will make extreme algal bloom events up to 10 times more likely by late century. Warmer water also encourages bacteria like Vibrio (which can cause serious infections in humans) to flourish in the Baltic’s brackish shallows – a public health threat that has already materialized during hot summers.

Another dramatic change is in the distribution of marine species. The Baltic Sea is the world’s largest brackish water body, home to a mix of saltwater and freshwater species balanced on a delicate salinity knife-edge. Climate change is expected to bring more rainfall and river runoff to the region (especially in winters), which could further lower the Baltic’s salinity. Paradoxically, while warmer temperatures allow more southerly, warm-water species to move into the Baltic, the decreasing salinity can push out some native marine species that can’t tolerate fresher water. Already, there are observations of new arrivals: fish that traditionally stayed in warmer Atlantic waters have been venturing into Scandinavian seas and the southern Baltic. Fishermen near Denmark, for example, are now catching significant numbers of anchovy, sea bass, and even species like mullet and smooth-hound shark, which historically were uncommon so far north. At the same time, some cold-loving, bigger fish are retreating to deeper, cooler parts of the North Sea and Baltic, or migrating further north towards the Arctic Ocean. This reshuffling of marine life can destabilize the food web. Cod, once a cornerstone commercial fish in the Baltic, have struggled in warmer, oxygen-poor waters – their habitat shrinks as deep waters lose oxygen and the surface warms.

The Baltic’s challenges are compounded by longstanding environmental issues such as eutrophication (excess nutrients causing dead zones) and pollution. Climate change acts as a threat multiplier: for instance, stronger rainstorm runoff can wash more farm fertilizer into the sea, feeding more algae; weaker winter ice means more wave action eroding coasts. A recent HELCOM (Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission) report emphasized that rising water temperatures, reduced ice cover, and more extreme weather are already evident in the Baltic region, underscoring an urgent need for adaptation. All eight EU member states around the Baltic, plus Russia and Norway, will need to cooperate to manage these climate impacts on a shared sea – whether it’s coordinating emergency response to floods and storms or adjusting fishing quotas as species change.

Adapting to a New Era and Naming the Unnamable

The Nordic and Baltic societies are not standing idle in the face of these challenges. In many respects, these countries are at the forefront of climate adaptation and mitigation efforts – from Denmark’s coastal flood defenses, to Finland’s sustainable forestry, to Sweden’s climate legislation aiming for net-zero emissions. Yet, the scope of transformation required is daunting. How do you culturally adapt to a world where the very symbols of your environment may disappear? In Iceland, people held a “funeral” for Okjökull glacier, marking the first glacier lost to climate change with a memorial plaque that bears a letter to the future. The plaque’s inscription is both mournful and hopeful, urging future generations to know that we understood what was happening and had the opportunity to act before it was too late. Similarly, Norwegian scientists, after documenting seabird declines, drew parallels to glacier retreat and created powerful visual comparisons – because sometimes seeing the empty cliffs drives home the urgency more than numbers.

Adapting will mean finding new balance in both practical and poetic senses. Language and culture are adapting: the Icelandic language, for one, is inventing terms for phenomena that didn’t exist in the past (such as “lónið” for glacial lagoons forming at glacier termini) and repurposing old words like “hlýindi” (a word for a period of warmth) to describe unprecedented mild winters. As Magnason’s work highlights, the names we give to places may lag behind reality – one day soon, new Icelandic maps might label former glaciers as “dalur” (valley) or add “forest” to names where no forest stood before. This linguistic evolution is a small reflection of a greater need: societies will have to be nimble and creative in responding to climate change, just as language is nimble in describing a changing world.

In summary, the Nordic and Baltic region faces a wide array of climate challenges, many of which are accelerating:

• Glacial Retreat and Sea-Level Rise: Rapid melting of glaciers (e.g. Iceland, Norway, Sweden) contributes to global sea-level rise and reshapes local geography. Communities must contend with coastal erosion and plan for rising seas.
• Ecosystem Disruption and Biodiversity Loss: Iconic species are in decline. Seabird colonies have crashed (up to 70–90% declines in some areas) due to warming oceans and food scarcity. Forest and tundra ecosystems are shifting, putting pressure on wildlife and indigenous livelihoods.
• Extreme Weather Events: Once rare extremes are becoming commonplace – from heatwaves topping 30–33 °C in the Arctic Circle to severe wildfires and winter storms. Northern Europe must brace for more frequent droughts, wildfires, intense rainfall, and flooding events as the climate oscillates between new extremes.
• Marine and Coastal Changes: The Baltic Sea is warming and freshening, which encourages algal blooms and could alter the marine food web. Fisheries are seeing new species while losing others, demanding adaptive management. Reduced sea ice and thawing permafrost also open up Arctic shipping routes and resource extraction – bringing opportunities and environmental risks.

Despite the enormity of the task, there are reasons for hope. Across the Nordic and Baltic countries, public awareness of climate change is high, and there is a strong ethos of environmental stewardship. As Magnason observed, in the short run one can be pessimistic, but in the long run there are reasons to be optimistic. A new generation of Northern Europeans is mobilizing – from Greta Thunberg’s Swedish school strikes inspiring global climate action, to local youth in Lapland and Latvia pushing for sustainable policies. They are armed with knowledge, and many have grown up witnessing these changes first-hand, whether it’s a glacier shrinking year by year or a beloved bird nesting ground emptying out. This generation recognizes that their future is intertwined with how well we tackle these climate challenges now.

Ultimately, the story of the Nordic and Baltic environment in the 21st century is one of profound change – loss, adaptation, and resilience. Glaciers may continue to melt and birds may continue to abandon cliffs if global emissions remain high, but the response is in human hands. Just as the Land of Fire and Ice (Iceland) must grapple with losing its ice, so too must all northern nations grapple with losing the familiar and encountering the unknown. The question “What do you call a valley that used to be a glacier?” is more than a linguistic puzzle – it’s a call to confront the reality of climate change. Answering it will involve science, ingenuity, and a willingness to transform our behavior. In that transformation lies the hope that these landscapes, though changed, will continue to sustain life and culture for generations to come. Each fjord, forest, and fjeld in the Nordic-Baltic realm has a future that is not yet written – and with concerted effort, it can be a future where nature and people thrive in a new harmony, even under a warming sky.

Sources: The insights and data above are drawn from a variety of scientific reports, news articles, and expert analyses. Key references include Andri S. Magnason’s NYTimes essay “The Icelandic Landscape Is Changing, and It’s Changing Us” (July 19, 2025) for first-hand observations in Iceland; a WWF interview with Magnason in The Circle magazine; climate research summaries by Baltic scientists; news reports from ArcticToday on Nordic glacier trends; The Guardian on seabird declines and the 2018 wildfires; and a 2019 study led by Markus Meier on Baltic Sea future scenarios, among others. These sources collectively paint the picture of a region in the midst of profound environmental change. The consistent message is that while the challenges are immense, understanding them is the first step to crafting solutions – and there is agency for Nordic and Baltic communities to shape the outcome.

‍