The Soviet TV Towers of the Baltics: Twin Siblings and a Lone Rebel

The story of the Baltic TV towers, built in the 1970s–80s under Soviet rule, sheds light on a mix of shared engineering, centralized planning, and local touches that shaped these landmarks.

Tallinn: A Tower for the 1980 Olympics

Tallinn’s TV Tower was born directly from the Soviet Union’s drive to modernize communications in the 1970s. Construction began in 1975 on the eve of a big event: the 1980 Moscow Olympics, for which Tallinn hosted the sailing regatta. The goal was to boost broadcast range and quality in Estonia, and the USSR spared no expense – 17,000 tons of concrete and 1900 tons of steel went into the tower’s structure. When finished in July 1980, the Tallinn TV Tower stood 314 m tall, by far the tallest structure in Northern Europe at the time. It consisted of a 190 m reinforced concrete core topped by a steel antenna mast of about 124 m, with a broad circular observation deck at 170 m high. (Originally a rotating restaurant was planned there, though a stationary cafe opened instead.)

The Tallinn tower’s creation was a multinational effort typical of Soviet projects. The design team was led by David Baziladze, a Georgian architect, working alongside local Estonian architect Juri Sinis. Structural engineering came from two Russians, Vladimir Obydov and Yevgeny Ignatov, and dozens of construction bureaus across the USSR contributed to the build. In effect, it was Moscow’s show of force in engineering – a point reinforced by the fact that it opened just in time to beam out Olympic sailing coverage. Yet Tallinn’s tower would soon acquire a very local symbolism: in August 1991, as Estonia fought to restore independence, citizens formed human chains to protect the TV tower from Soviet troops. Bullet holes at the base (still visible today) attest to its role as a symbol of freedom as much as technology‍.

Vilnius: A Twin Tower with a Twist

If Tallinn’s tower was impressive, Lithuania soon matched it. The Vilnius TV Tower rose almost in parallel – construction started in 1974 and the tower opened in early 1981. At 326.5 m tall, it is just a dozen meters taller than its Estonian “sibling,” and the family resemblance is obvious. Like Tallinn’s, the Vilnius tower features a slim hollow concrete shaft (~190 m) supporting a flying-saucer-shaped observation deck, topped by a long needle-like antenna. In fact, the two towers had overlapping designers. The same Georgian architect David Baziladze (Besiladze) who worked on Tallinn’s project was a lead designer in Vilnius, and Soviet engineer Vladimir Obydov also contributed his expertise to both. This common lineage resulted in nearly identical architectural designs – one Soviet publication noted that the Vilnius TV Tower has a similar design to Tallinn’s, aside from details like a rotating deck. Indeed, Vilnius installed a revolving restaurant platform at 165 m that slowly spins to give diners a panoramic view. (This rotating café, named Paukščių takas or “Milky Way,” was such a complex engineering feat that it opened a year after the tower itself.)

Despite their twin-like appearance, the towers were not the result of direct Baltic cooperation so much as parallel responses to the USSR’s plans. Vilnius’s tower was funded through a Soviet five-year plan as a “strategic investment” in Lithuanian SSR infrastructure. Specialists from several republics were dispatched to ensure its completion – reflecting how centrally Moscow managed these projects. The local architects (like Kazimieras Balėnas, who designed the tower’s base building and later the restaurant) had to work within the proven template of Tallinn’s tower, adapting it to Vilnius’s site on a hill in the Karoliniškės district‍. Still, Vilnius’s TV tower quickly gained a life of its own. It too became a dramatic stage for history in January 1991, when pro-independence civilians formed barricades around the tower. Soviet troops stormed it, tragically killing 14 defenders, but ultimately failed to hold it. To this day, the Vilnius tower is revered as a memorial to Lithuania’s fight for freedom, even as it serves visitors with its skyline restaurant and observation deck.

Riga: Reaching Higher with a Futuristic Design

If Tallinn and Vilnius built variations on a theme, Riga chose to break the mold completely. The Riga Radio & TV Tower, constructed a few years later (1979–1989), looks more like a science-fiction rocket than a sibling of the other two. At 368.5 m high, it outstrips its Baltic cousins and is the tallest tower in the European Union (surpassing even Berlin’s famous TV Tower)‍. To achieve this height, Riga’s tower employs a radically different structure: three giant tapering legs of reinforced concrete and steel, which join around a central core – a tripod design that gives it an airy, open look. It’s one of only a handful of three-legged towers in the world (comparable examples include the Prague Žižkov Tower and Belgrade’s Avala Tower) and it immediately set Riga’s skyline apart.

The design was the brainchild of yet another Georgian architect, Kims Nikuradze, whose proposal was chosen in 1972 for Riga’s tower. Nikuradze’s vision was bold: the tower’s three support pillars rise 88 m before merging, and they house two high-speed inclined elevators zipping up inside two of the legs. Above that, a sleek central shaft clad in corten-like metal stretches to the top, giving the impression of a long, modernist pyramid or an “elongated Eiffel Tower.” The observation level and former café in Riga’s tower sit much lower than in Tallinn or Vilnius – at about 97 m up – but what the tower lacks in viewing height it makes up for in sheer broadcast reach‍. Thanks to its elevated island location (built on Zaķusala, an island in the Daugava River) and its record height, the Riga tower’s transmitters could blanket a huge portion of Latvia once it began service in 1986.

As with the other Baltic towers, Moscow’s hand was heavily involved. The project was funded by the Soviet central government and assembled using resources from across the USSR‍. Engineers prefabricated steel components in Chelyabinsk, quarrymen supplied dolomite stone from Estonia’s Saaremaa island for the foundation, and Karelian granite was used in its base – a literal material connection between Latvia and other Soviet regions. By the time Riga’s tower was completed in 1989, the USSR was on the brink of collapse, and Latvia soon reclaimed the structure as its own. For Latvians, the tower has become a proud landmark of innovation; it underwent major renovations starting in 2019 to add new visitor facilities, aiming to reopen in time for its own 40th anniversary and beyond‍.

Shared Origins, Different Paths

Why did Estonia and Lithuania end up with “twin” towers while Latvia’s looks so different? The answer lies in the Soviet system of the era. The Tallinn and Vilnius towers were conceived almost simultaneously in the 1970s, under a union-wide push to expand television broadcasting – effectively a directive from Moscow that each republic upgrade its infrastructure. The Soviet authorities tended to use successful blueprints repeatedly, and they tapped the same circle of experts to carry out these projects. In Tallinn’s case, a Georgian designer and Russian engineers delivered a working tower by 1980; when Vilnius needed a tower, those same experts (Baziladze, Obydov, et al.) were called in, bringing their established design with only minor modifications‍. There was little direct collaboration between the Baltic republics – instead, coordination happened above, at the USSR ministry level, which deployed multi-national design teams as needed. The outcome was two structurally almost identical towers built in different cities at roughly the same time, a sort of prefabricated approach to high-rise architecture.

By the late 1970s, however, technology and tastes were evolving. Riga’s tower came later and was envisioned on a grander scale – the Latvians (and their Soviet overseers) wanted the tallest, most modern tower in the region. Rather than copy the older single-shaft design, the project embraced a daring new concept by Nikuradze, likely influenced by other experimental towers being built in the 1980s. The fact that the Riga tower’s construction extended into the perestroika years may have given its builders some leeway to innovate, resulting in the unique three-legged structure. In essence, Tallinn’s and Vilnius’s towers show the uniformity of Soviet central planning, whereas Riga’s showcases a later period of ambition and innovation within that system.

Today, all three Baltic towers have transcended their Cold War origins. They serve as tourist attractions, broadcasting centers, and symbols of national identity. In Tallinn and Vilnius, the towers are inexorably linked to the Singing Revolution and independence (each literally defended by citizens in 1991), proving that architecture can become a focal point of history. Riga’s tower, while not the scene of the same dramatic events, has become a symbol of Latvian technological pride – standing tall through the turn of the millennium and slated for a high-tech rejuvenation. Together, the stories of these towers highlight a fascinating chapter of Baltic architecture, where shared Soviet directives produced “architectural siblings” in two countries, while a third sibling chose its own bold path. The result is a trio of iconic structures – two that look like twins, and one very modern outlier – each a concrete (and steel) testament to the era in which it was built.‍

‍